Ershova N. EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS ASSESSMENT IN THE ASPECT OF COMPETENCE FORMATION. LIFELONG EDUCATION: The 21st Century.
2022. № 4 (40). DOI: 10.15393/j5.art.2022.8010


Issue 4 (40)

Learning throughout the life
pdf-version

EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS ASSESSMENT IN THE ASPECT OF COMPETENCE FORMATION

Ershova Natalya Yu.
PhD in Physics and Mathematics, Associate Professor, Department of General Physics, Institute of Physics and Technology
Petrozavodsk State University
(Petrozavodsk, Russian Federation)
ershova@petrsu.ru
Keywords:
accreditation of educational programs
quality of education
planned results of the educational program
funds of evaluation funds
complex practical task
assessment of the formation of competence.		 Abstract: the article considers the features of engineering educational programs accreditation in higher education. The goals and methods of confirming the compliance of the education quality with the established accreditation indicators are analyzed. The options for student learning evaluation through the «degree of achievement of the planned results of the educational program» are considered. Assignment examples of the from the funds of assessment tools in the disciplines of the main professional educational program of higher education 09.03.01 «Computer science and computer technology of Petrozavodsk State University» are given. Refinement and execution of assignments from the fund of assessment tools for the discipline for assessing universal and professional competencies in general according to the methodology proposed by the Foundation for Infrastructure and Educational Programs (RUSNANO group) are demonstrated. The structure of the document «Trajectories (stages) of the competence formation of the main professional educational program of higher education» as part of the educational program and its use for assessing the formation of competencies is considered. It is proposed to create a bank of complex practical tasks for assessing the formation of competencies of the Federal State Educational Standards of Higher Education of programs implemented by the university.
Paper submitted on: 08/10/2022; Accepted on: 11/21/2022; Published online on: 12/20/2022.

References

  1. On education in the Russian Federation: federal law of the Russian Federation of December 29, 2012. № 273-FZ. (In Russ.)
  2. Regulations on state accreditation of educational activities [Electronic resource]. Electron. dan. URL: https://base.garant.ru/403372101/ (date of access: 10.04.2022). (In Russ.)
  3. Belskaya E., Popov L. On the issue of the quality of higher education. In: Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 20. Pedagogicheskoye obrazovaniye. 2013. № 3. P. 71–82. (In Russ.)
  4. Chuchalin A., Petrovskaya T., Kulyukina E. Worldwide. CDIO Initiative. Planned learning outcomes (CDIO Syllabus). Tomsk, 2011. 22 p.
  5. Gnutova A., Nechitailo S. On the issue of the quality of higher education in Russia. In: Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. Seriya Psikhologo-pedagogicheskiye nauki. 2015. № 4 (28). P. 20–29. (In Russ.)
  6. Ekimova T. [et al.].  Formation of general cultural competencies of graduates of engineering areas of training. In: Inzhenernoye obrazovaniye. 2014. № 15. P. 210–215. (In Russ.)
  7. Ershova N., Vakulenko A., Sementsov A. Experience in implementing projects based on FPGAs. In: Multi-core processors, parallel programming, FPGAs, signal processing systems: collection of articles of the All-Russian Scientific and practical conference. Barnaul, 2015. P. 27–33.
  8. Ershova N., Tarasov K. Management of the system of evaluation of learning outcomes based on CDIO standards. In: Universitetskoye upravleniye: praktika i analiz. 2015. № 5 P. 69–79. (In Russ.)
  9. Tolkova N., Enova I., Palchikovskaya G. Methodological bases for assessing the quality of higher education. In: Problemy sovremennogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya. 2019. № 64-4. P. 237–240 (In Russ.)
  10. Tysyachin A., Mikhailov O. Modern approaches to assessing the quality of education in the world and Russian economy. In: Vestnik GUU. 2017. № 4. P. 73–78 (In Russ.)
  11. Shityakova N., Verkhovykh I. Determination of educational results of the main professional educational program as a condition for an objective assessment of the quality of education. In: Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Obrazovaniye. Pedagogicheskiye nauki. 2018. Vol. 10. № 3. P. 15–23. (In Russ.)
  12. Undergraduate Educational standard 09.03.01 Informatics and computer technology [Electronic resource]. Electron. dan. URL: https://petrsu.ru/specialization/513 (date of access: 30.07.2022). (In Russ.)
  13. Ershova N., Ekimova T. Methods of designing an innovative program of additional professional education for the nanoindustry. In: Nepreryvnoye obrazovaniye: XXI vek [Lifelong education: The 21st century]. 2014. № 3 (7). [Electronic resource]. Electron. dan. DOI: 10.15393/j5.art.2014.2448 (date of access: 30.07.2022). (In Russ.)
  14. Pedagogical thesaurus. 2016. Tyutkova I. A. [Electronic resource]. Electron. dan. URL: https://didacts.ru/termin/rezultat-obuchenija.html (date of access: 30.07.2022).

Displays: 347; Downloads: 117;

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15393/j5.art.2022.8010