SHOBONOV N. FEATURES OF ORGANIZING TEAM WORK IN A GENERAL EDUCATIONAL ORGANIZATION. LIFELONG EDUCATION: The 21st Century.
2022. № 2 (38). DOI: 10.15393/j5.art.2022.7631


Issue 2 (38)

Education Management in an open global society

pdf-version

FEATURES OF ORGANIZING TEAM WORK IN A GENERAL EDUCATIONAL ORGANIZATION

SHOBONOV Nikolay A.
Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Economics and Law
Nizhny Novgorod State University named after N. I. Lo-bachevsky, Pavlovsky Branch
(Nizhny Novgorod, Russian Federation)
Shobonov_n@mail.ru
Keywords:
team
management
group
team player skills.
Abstract: the article is devoted to the problem of team building in a modern school in the context of increasing the effectiveness of educational activities. Based on the analysis of pedagogical and managerial literature, the analysis of educational management practice, the author came to the conclusion that teamwork in a general educational organization is one of the important resources for increasing the availability of quality education. The author analyzes some domestic and foreign studies of the command style of management, paying special attention to the pedagogical heritage of A. S. Makarenko, associated with the implementation of the democratic style of management in practice. The article notes the distinctive features of the command management style, the differ-ences between a team and a group of people, lists the conditions under which a group can develop into a team, thanks to the purposeful activity of its leader. The advantages of the team are noted, the factors influencing the effectiveness of its activities are listed, among which the skills of a team player stand out. The article formulates the main problems that impede the formation and development of school teams.
Paper submitted on: 05/15/2022; Accepted on: 06/03/2022; Published online on: 06/26/2022.

References

  1. Order of the Ministry of Labor and Social Protection of the Russian Federation dated April 19, 2021. № 250n. «On approval of the professional standard “Head of an educational organization (management of a preschool educational organization and a general educational organization)”». (In Russ.)
  2. Kozyrev YU. V. Organizatsiya komandnoy raboty uchiteley v usloviyakh razvitiya shkoly : dis. kand. ped. nauk. St. Petersburg, 2002. 175 p. (In Russ.)
  3. Komarov M. S., Gorshkov V. Yu. Professional values of the teacher: commitment to school and job satisfaction. In: Yaroslavskiy pedagogicheskiy vestnik. 1998. № 3 (15). P. 61–66. (In Russ.)
  4. Makarenko A. S. Methods of organizing the educational process. In: Pedagogical works: in 8 volumes. T. 1: Pedagogical work (1922–1936). Moscow : Pedagogy, 1984. 368 p. (In Russ.)
  5. Makarchenko M. A. Theory of organization and organizational behavior: textbook for bachelors. St. Petersburg, 2008. 160 p. (In Russ.)
  6. Maksimova E. A. Teamwork as a resource for school development. Moscow, 2015. 144 p. (In Russ.)
  7. Meskon M., Albert М., Hedouri F. Fundamentals of Management. Moscow, 1995. 704 p. (In Russ.)
  8. Farkhatdinov N. G., Evstigneeva N. V., KurakinD. Yu. Models of management of an educational organization in the context of reforms: the experience of sociological analysis. In: Voprosy obrazovaniya. 2015. № 2. P. 196‒219. (In Russ.)
  9. Khokhlov A. V. Culture of team work as a competitive advantage of the head of a general education organization. In: Nauchnoye obespecheniye sistemy povysheniya kvalifikatsii kadrov. 2019. № 2 (39). P. 5‒14. (In Russ.)
  10. Shobonov N. A. Conflict competence of the school principal. In: Izvestiya Baltiyskoy gosudarstvennoy akademii rybopromyslovogo flota: psikhologo-pedagogicheskiye nauki. 2021. № 3 (57). P. 80–84. (In Russ.)
  11. Shobonov N. A. Public administration in the context of the implementation of the Federal Law. In: Narodnoye obrazovaniye. 2016. № 9–10 (1459). P. 46‒51. (In Russ.)
  12. Dee J. R., Henkin A. B., Singleton C. A. Organizational Commitment of Teachers in Urban Schools: Examining the Effects of Team Structures. In: Urban Education. 2006. Vol. 41. № 6. P. 1‒7.

 


Displays: 2221; Downloads: 231;

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15393/j5.art.2022.7631