Vasilieva A. V. CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FORMATION IN INTERACTIVE LEARNING SUBJECT AREA (IN PEDAGOGY AND METHODOLOGY). LIFELONG EDUCATION: The 21st Century.
2021. № 1 (33). DOI: 10.15393/j5.art.2021.6664


Issue 1 (33)

Lifelong learning in the modern world: the research and design methodology
pdf-version

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FORMATION IN INTERACTIVE LEARNING SUBJECT AREA (IN PEDAGOGY AND METHODOLOGY)

Vasilieva Anastasya V.
Ph. D in pedagogy, a lecturer at the chair of Environmental Design
St. Petersburg State University
(St. Petersburg, Russian Federation)
littlegenius@yandex.ru
Keywords:
interactive learning
conceptual framework
two-level triadic category decoding method
mutation method
cognitive activity
the teaching of foreign languages and Russian as foreign language.		 Abstract: the rapid development of innovative technologies and their implementation in the educational process puts forward the problem of forming the conceptual apparatus for both pedagogy and methodology as well as many subject areas within them. The solution of this problem is of great importance for the qualitative development of pedagogical education. In particular, this problem affects interactive learning directly. To cover the essence and content of interactive learning a large number of concepts is used but they do not constitute a structured conceptual field. As a result it hinders the development of a unified theory of interactive learning, and presents certain difficulties in its implementation. The purpose of this article is to form the conceptual framework of the subject area of interactive learning based on its essential aspects. We believe that the formation of the conceptual apparatus of the subject area of interactive learning based on its essential aspects will allow us to obtain a description of the research object with sufficient completeness and consistency.
The methodological framework of the present research is based on content analysis of scientific and methodological literature, two-level triadic decryption method, method of mutation.
Results and findings are as follows: The obtained system of categories that provide a complete and consistent description of the interactive learning subject area; the conditions under which the learning takes the form of interactive one; the identified basic characteristics of interactive learning; the main types of basic characteristics of interactive learning; the ordered relationship between categories, the decrypted interactive learning, and on the basis of the above mentioned synthesized and identified categories comprises the conceptual framework of the subject area of the studied phenomenon.
The conceptual framework of the subject area of interactive learning, formed on the basis of its basic interrelated categories and concepts, first, describes interactive learning with the necessary and sufficient degree of completeness, second, provides a systematic view of the phenomenon under consideration, and third, contains resources and outlines directions for further qualitative research of the subject area of interactive learning. The results obtained can be used to identify the evolutionary sequence of stages in the formation of interactive learning to ensure the management of the process of its creation and development.
Paper submitted on: 12/22/2024; Accepted on: 12/22/2024; Published online on: 03/26/2021.

References

 

  1. Aksyutina Z. A. Methodology-theoretical analysis of the concept of «social education». In: Vestnik Omskogo Universiteta. 2014. № 2. P. 146–151. (In Russ.)
  2. Ahmetova D. Z., CHelnokova T. A. The conceptual framework of Inclusive Education as an innovative phenomenon in the educational space of Russia. In: Ural'skij gosudarstvennyj pedagogicheskij universitet. 2016. Issue 9. P. 449–459. (In Russ.)
  3. Bojko P. D. The use of categorical system in the development of the legal and administrative procedure for the development of agro-industrial complex of Omsk region. In: Vestnik Omskogo Universiteta. 2013. № 4. P. 235–241. (In Russ.)
  4. Boush G. D. Clusters in Economics: scientific theory, research methodology, management concept. Omsk, 2013. 408 p. (In Russ.)
  5. Boush G. D., Razumov V. I. Forming of concept systems to study objects in economy: application of the dynamic information systems theory to business clusters. In: Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Filosofiya. 2011. Vol. 9. № 4. P. 30–37. (In Russ.)
  6. Verbitsky A. A., Trunova E. G. Problems of adequacy of the modern education conceptual apparatus. In: Pedagogika. 2017. № 87. P. 3–15. (In Russ.)
  7. Gavronskaya Yu. Yu. «Interactivity» and «Interactive learning». In: Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. 2008. № 7. P. 101–104. (In Russ.)
  8. Gushcha Yu. V. Concept and nature of Interactive teaching. In: Vestnik Polockogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya E, Pedagogicheskie nauki: nauchno-teoreticheskij zhurnal. 2012. № 7. P. 42–45. (In Russ.)
  9. Doronina E. G., Mozheevskaya A. E. Linguistic basics of creating a multimedia interactive guide to a foreign language. In: Nauka YUUrGU. Sekcii social'no-gumanitarnyh nauk: materialy 67-j nauchnoj konferencii. 2015. P. 1158–1163. (In Russ.)
  10. Kapranova E. A. Interactive learning: conceptual basis and approaches. In: Vestnik Polockogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya «Pedagogicheskie nauki». 2012. № 7. P. 36–41. (In Russ.)
  11. Kozlova K. S. Post-industrial society as a socio-philosophical object. In: Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskienauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosyteorii i praktiki. 2012. № 5 (19). Part 1. P. 82–88. (In Russ.)
  12. Korotaeva E. V. Organization of Interactions in the Educational Process of the School, Moscow, 2016. 192 p. (In Russ.)
  13. Koshkina E. A. The conceptual and terminological apparatus of pedagogy as a subject of historical and pedagogical research. In: Innovacionnye proekty i programmy v obrazovanii. 2013. № 4. P. 11–15. (In Russ.).
  14. Moskalevich G. N. Interactive learning technology: concept and essence, features and benefits. In: Innovacionnye obrazovatel'nye tekhnologii. 2014. № 1 (37). P. 43–48. (In Russ.)
  15. Nedoluzhko O. V. A new approach to form the conceptual space of the phenomenon of intellectual capital for an organization. In: Vestnik udmurtskogo universiteta. Seriya «Ekonomika i parvo». 2016. Vol. 26. Issue 2. P. 42–49. (In Russ.)
  16. Panina T. S., Vavilova L. N. Interactive Learning. In: Obrazovanie i nauka. 2007. № 6 (48). P. 32–41. (In Russ.)
  17. Prohorov E. P. Terminological apparatus – the conceptual and semantic skeleton of science. In: Vestnik moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya. 10. Zhurnalistika. 2012. № 1. P. 27–38. (In Russ.)
  18. Razumov V. I., Sizikov V. P. Information bases of system synthesis. Part I. Information bases of the knowledge system. Omsk, 2007. 266 p.
  19. Razumov V. I., Sizikov V. P. Categorical apparatus for the development of theoretical knowledge. In: Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. 2003. Issue 2. P. 37–40. (In Russ.)
  20. Sadykov T. M. The interactive technologies background. In: Problemy sovremennogo obrazovaniya. 2016. № 4. P. 158–160. (In Russ.)
  21. Selevko G. K. Encyclopedia of educational technologies. Part 1. Moscow, 2005. 535 p. (In Russ.)
  22. Semenova I. N. Formation of the conceptual framework of the technique and technology of training in the conditions of technologization of educational process. In: Vestnik TGPU. 2016. № 4 (169). P. 86–91. (In Russ.)
  23. Shlyahova I. B. Pedagogical paradigm, theory, problems, search for solutions. In: Teoriya i praktika obrazovaniya v sovremennom mire: materialy VII Mezhdunarnauch konf. Saint Petersburg. 2015. P. 54–64. (In Russ.)
  24. Shchekina S. S., Averkina G. V. Logical-methodology aspects of studying the conceptual and terminological system of pedagogy. In: Ponyatijnyj apparat pedagogiki i obrazovaniya. 2016. Issue 9. P. 121–135. (In Russ.)
  25. Izuagba A. C., Nwigwe N. V. Enhancing the teaching and learning of English language interactive strategies. In: ELTAN National Conference. A I F C E. Owerri, Imo State, 2012.
  26. Olivier J. Blended learning in a first-year language class: Evaluating the acceptance of an interactive learning environment. Cambrige,  2015. 120 p.
  27. Senthamarai S. Interactive teaching strategies. In: Journal of Applied and Advanced Research. 2018. Vol. 3. P. 36–38.
  28. Tomljenović Z. An Interactive Approach to Learning and Teaching in Visual Arts Education. In: CEPS Journal: Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal. 2015. Vol. 5. P. 73–93.
  29. Golovyashkina M. A. Implementation of an interactive paradigm of teaching a foreign language at the level of individual elements of the linguodidactic system [Electronic resource]. In: Obrazovatel'nye resursy i tekhnologii. 2018. № 1 (22). P. 16–22. Electron. dan. DOI: 10.21777/2500-2112-2018-1-16-22 (date of access: 02.01.2021). (In Russ.)
  30. Kil'dyusheva A. A. Studing a Museum as a category of thinking: experience of application of the of the dynamic information systems theory [Electronic resource]. In: Idei i idealy. 2019. Vol. 11.  Issue 2. Part 2. P. 420–438. Electron. dan. DOI: 10.17212/2075-0862-2019-11.2.2-420-438 (date of access: 02.01.2021). (In Russ.)
  31. Kurtvapova V. M. The conceptual framework of multicultural education [Electronic resource]. In: Vestnik moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya «Pedagogika» [Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University. Pedagogy science]. 2017. № 3. С. 46–54. Electron. dan.  DOI: 10.18384/2320-7219-2017-3-46-54 (date of access: 02.01.2021). (In Russ.)
  32. Polonskij V. M. Concept-terminological apparatus for pedagogy and education [Electronic resource]. In: Nauchnyj rezul'tat. Pedagogika i psihologiya obrazovaniya. 2017. Vol. 3. Issue. 2. P. 54–60. Electron. dan. DOI: 10.18413/2313-8971-2017-3-2-54-60 (date of access: 02.01.2021). (In Russ.)
  33. Bagramova N. V., Vasilieva A. V. Interactive Lesson as a Macro-Unit of Teaching Russian as a Foreign Language in Short-Term Courses [Electronic resource]. In: Philological Class. 2020. Vol. 1 (59). P. 171–181. Electron. dan. DOI: 10.26170/FK20-01-17 (date of access: 02.01.2021).
  34. Ceresia F. Interactive learning environments (ILEs) as effective tools for teaching social sciences [Electronic resource]. In: Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2016. Vol. 217. P. 512–521. Electron. dan. DOI:10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2016.02.031 (date of access: 02.01.2021).
  35. Fahim M., Seidi A. Interaction and Interactive English Teaching in the High School Level [Electronic resource]. In: Theory and Practice in Language Studies. 2013. Vol. 3. Issue 6. P. 932–937. Electron. dan. DOI:10.4304/TPLS.3.6.932-937 (date of access: 02.01.2021).
  36. Hall J. K., Verplaetse L. S. Second and Foreign Language Learning through Classroom Interaction [Electronic resource]. In: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 2000. 314 p. Electron. dan. DOI:10.4324/9781410605498 (date of access: 02.01.2021).
  37. Knežević S., Kovačević B. Interactive learning and students’ competence in teaching literature. [Electronic resource] In: Metodički obzori. 2011. Vol. 6. Issue 3. P. 83–92. Electron. dan. DOI:10.32728/MO.06.3.2011.06 (date of access: 02.01.2021).
  38. Lucero E. Scalante-Morales J. English Language Teacher educator integrational styles: Heterogenety and homogeneity in the ELTE classroom [Electronic resource]. In: HOW. 2018. Vol. 25 (1). P. 11–31. Electron. dan. DOI:10.19183/how.25.1.358 (date of access: 02.01.2021).
  39. Paule-Ruíz M. P. et al. Voice interactive learning: a framework and evaluation [Electronic resource]. In: Conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education (CIiTCSE). New York, 2013. P. 34–39. Electron. dan. DOI:10.1145/2462476.2462489 (date of access: 02.01.2021).
  40. Seedhouse P. Classroom interaction: possibilities and impossibilities [Electronic resource]. In: ELT Journal. 1996. Vol. 50. P. 16–24. Electron. dan. DOI:10.1093/elt/50.1.16 (date of access: 02.01.2021).

Displays: 2278; Downloads: 2697;

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15393/j5.art.2021.6664