Volkov P. B., Nagovicyn R. S. DIAGNOSTICS OPTIONS KEY COMPETENCES OF STUDENTS OF PEDAGOGICAL SPECIALITES IN THE ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING OUTCOMES. LIFELONG EDUCATION: The 21st Century.
2017. № 4 (20). DOI: 10.15393/j5.art.2017.3725


Issue 4 (20)

Lifelong learning in the modern world: the research and design methodology

pdf-version

DIAGNOSTICS OPTIONS KEY COMPETENCES OF STUDENTS OF PEDAGOGICAL SPECIALITES IN THE ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING OUTCOMES

Volkov Pavel B.
Academician of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences, Corresponding Member of the International Academy of Education, Glazov State Pedagogical Institute named after
(Glazov, Russia)
pbvolk@mail.ru
Nagovicyn Roman S.
Dean of the Faculty of Pedagogy and Art Education, Glazov State Pedagogical Institute named after V.G. Korolenko
(Glazov, Russia)
romanagovitsin@rambler.ru
Keywords:
modular training
core competencies
duties
Abstract: The article presents options for diagnostics of key competences of students of the Pedagogical University in the Unit study to assess its results. It is anticipated that the introduction of diagnostic options will make the transition from traditional assessment tools for quantitative indicators to adapt modern means of assessment of learning outcomes, qualitative indicators. Subject to assessment levels forming the core competencies; traced the transition from competence to work functions on the basis of knowledge, skills and competences and match action through knowledge, skills and employment action. Diagnostic options are aimed at establishing a balance between competence on discipline and work function of a professional standard; planning and predicting the outcomes of learning. Testing of diagnostic options takes the form of face-to-face and distance learning through the individual and collective work with different age groups of students. The structure of the discipline consists of 3 modules. Mastering the content of educational material for each module of discipline contributes to competence. Analysis of results level of competency formed graduates confirms the efficacy of use in educational process of Pedagogical University unit training, improved the quality of graduates and form competence. The reported study was funded by RFBR according to the research project №16-16-18003.
Paper submitted on: 11/15/2017; Accepted on: 11/30/2017; Published online on: 12/22/2017.

      References

1.      Baguehs M., Labini M. S., Zinov'eva N. M. Razlichiya v standartah ocenki uspevaemosti i finansirovanie universitetov: opyt Italii// Voprosy obrazovaniya, 2009. № 4. S. 82–106

2.      Volkov P.B. Model' sistemy povysheniya kvalifikacii uchitelya k primeneniyu informacionnyh tekhnologij v uchebnom processe // Innovacionnye modeli – osnovy kadrovoj modernizacii municipal'nyh metodicheskih sluzhb RF. Sbornik materialov Vserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii. - Moskva, 2010. – s.270 – 273.

3.      Volkov P.B. Sovershenstvovanie sistemy obucheniya studentov pedagogicheskih special'nostej v sisteme nepreryvnogo obrazovaniya // Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. – 2016. – № 5

4.      Volkov P.B. Programmnoe upravlenie sovershenstvovaniem fizicheskoj kul'tury studentov s primeneniem mobil'nyh sredstv  / P.B. Volkov, R. S. Nagovicyn i dr. // Teoriya i praktika fizicheskoj kul'tury. – 2015 g. - №4

5.      Volodina G. E., Obolonskaya A. V., Ratt T. A. Universitetsko-shkol'nyj klaster - sreda razvitiya professional'nyh kompetencij uchitelya // Voprosy obrazovaniya, 2014. № 1. S. 46–56.

6.      Denisova I. A., Karceva M. A. Ocenka otdachi ot obrazovatel'nyh special'nostej v Rossii // Voprosy obrazovaniya, 2007. № 1. S. 248–250

7.      Evzrezov D.V. «Obrazovanie 2020» - vyzov sisteme obrazovaniya // Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, 2014, № 2 (18).

8.      Zamkov O. O., Pereseckij A. A. EGEH i akademicheskie uspekhi studentov bakalavriata MIEHF NIU VSHEH // Prikladnaya ehkonometrika. 2013. T. 30. № 2. S. 93–114.

9.      Ivanova N. L., Popova E. P. Professionaly i problema vnedreniya innovacij v vuze // Voprosy obrazovaniya, 2017. № 1. S. 184–206.

10.    Kachestvo vysshego obrazovaniya i sistema zachetnyh edinic // Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii, 2004, №5, s. 14-18.

11.    Majorov A. N., CHepurnyh E. E. Rejting zabluzhdeniya ili zabluzhdeniya rejtinga // Voprosy obrazovaniya, 2007. № 2. S. 251–267

12.    Meshkova T.A., Sabel'nikova E.V. Rezul'taty i perspektivy mezhdunarodnoj ocenki vysshego obrazovaniya: (po itogam realizacii proekta ANELO v Rossii) // Analiticheskie obzory po napravleniyam razvitiya vysshego obrazovaniya: [obzornaya informaciya] obrazovaniya i nauki Rossijskoj Federacii, Federal'nyj in-t obrazovaniya. - M., 2013. V'p. 12.

13.    Mihajlova E.K. Rejtingovyj podhod v obuchenii // Sovremennye issledovaniya social'nyh problem. 2012, №26, s.26- 37

14.    Mogilev  A.V. Primenenie kompetentnostnoj modeli testirovaniya v celyah povysheniya kachestva obrazovaniya // Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2015. N2

15.    Nagovicyn R.S.,  Volkov P.B., Tutolmin A.V, L.V. CHubukova. Organizacionnyj klimat i individual'no - psihologicheskie kachestva lichnosti uchastnikov uchebno-vospitatel'nogo processa v obrazovatel'nom klastere «institut – kolledzh» / //Alma mater. Vestnik vysshej shkoly, 2017, №3

16.    R. S. Nagovicyn, V. P. Volkov, A. A. Miroshnichenko Planirovanie fizicheskoj nagruzki v godichnom cikle u studentov / Physical education of students, 2017;3: 126-133

17.    Nigmatov Z. G. Sovremennye sredstva ocenivaniya obrazovatel'nyh rezul'tatov // Uchen. zap. Kazan. un-ta. Ser. Gumanitarnye nauki, 2013, №26, s.220-227.

18.    Selezneva N.A. Gosudarstvennyj obrazovatel'nyj standart vysshego professional'nogo obrazovaniya novogo pokoleniya kak kompleksnaya norma kachestva vysshego obrazovaniya. Obshchaya koncepciya i model'. - M., 2007.

19.    Serebrova O.F. Realizaciya sistemy MOODLE v processe podgotovki bakalavrov-pedagogov // Rol' sovremennogo universiteta v tekhnicheskoj i kadrovoj modernizacii rossijskoj ehkonomiki: sbornik trudov IX Mezhd. nauchn. – metod. konf. – Kostroma, 2015, s. 212-213.

20.    CHernyavskaya A.L. Sovremennye sredstva ocenivaniya rezul'tatov obucheniya: uchebno-metodicheskoe posobie.YAroslavl', 2008, 126 s.

21.    Volkov P.B. Assessment of the quality of work and training of teachers and students during the reorganization of the educational institution by merger in a scientific-educational cluster / Modern European Researches, № 5. 2016, s. 124 -131.

22.    Volkov P.B. Organization of scientific research activities of students in the educational cluster «College-University»UdmurtRepublic/ International Journal Of Applied And Fundamental Research. – 2016. – № 2 URL: www.science-sd.com/ 464-25123 (06.09.2016).

 


Displays: 13051; Downloads: 1106;

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15393/j5.art.2017.3725