Brühlmann О., Hildebrandt E., Marty A. Team teaching: review of international empirical research II. LIFELONG EDUCATION: The 21st Century.
2016. № 3 (15). DOI: 10.15393/j5.art.2016.3206


Issue 3 (15)

Human and teaching resources of continuing education
pdf-version

Team teaching: review of international empirical research II

Brühlmann О
M.A., Lecturer in the Module Group Research and Development at the Pedagogical University FHNW Northwestern Switzerland
(Brugg, Swiss)
olga.bruehlmann@fhnw.ch
Hildebrandt E
Head of Preschool Pedagogy and Primary Education Chair at the Pedagogical Institute of North-West Switzerland, a member of the International Academy for Humanization of Education
elke.hildebrandt@fhnw.ch
Marty A
Associate professor of Preschool Pedagogy and Primary Education Chair at the Pedagogical Institute of North-West Switzerland
astrid.marty@fhnw.ch
Keywords:
team teaching
co-teaching
cooperation
joint work
teachers' training
professionalization.		 Abstract: the article contains the review of the international English speaking empirical studies on team teaching. Today the teamwork and team teaching is the inherent part of everyday teachers' activities, for instance, in the case of integrative and inclusive education aimed at supporting the children with special needs. Besides, team teaching and inclusive education are used at the practical stages of pedagogical education more and more often. The obtained results from the point of view of effectiveness and potential application of team teaching and co-teaching are sometimes contradictive, in particular regarding the ambiguous terms application, and because of using different schemes of investigations. In English speaking countries there are long standing traditions of team teaching research and co-teaching in comparison with German speaking countries. That is why it is reasonable to make a review of knowledge obtained empirically in English-speaking countries by the empirical way. In the first article written by the authors and published in the journal «Lifelong Learning: XXI century» the main information on team teaching was presented at the meta-analysis and meta-synthesis levels in the context of inclusive educational methods. The article contains recently obtained data, connected with the studies not only in the field of inclusive education, but also including other aspects, such as: the impact of team teaching on the students, teachers, the educational process development, organizational development, etc.
The review offered by the authors might be of interest for the researchers in the field of educational technologies, for methodologists, and may be used in the system of continuous professional-pedagogical education.
Paper submitted on: 08/18/2016; Accepted on: 08/26/2016; Published online on: 09/23/2016.


  1. Aliakbari M., Mansouri Nejad A. On the Effectiveness of Team Teaching in Promoting Lerners’ Grammatical Proficiency // Canadian Journal of Education. 2013. № 36 (3). P. 5–22.
  2. Al-Saaideh M. A. A Rationale to Adopt Team Teaching in Prevocational Education in Jordan // Journal of Instructional Psychology. 2010. № 37 (4). P. 269−285.
  3. Armstrong D. G. Team Teaching and Academic Achievement. Review of Educational Research. 1977. P. 65−86
  4. Baeten M., Simons M. Student teachers` team teaching: models, effects, and conditions for implementation // Teaching and Teacher Education 2014. № 41. P. 92–110.
  5. Bryant Davis, K. E., Dieker L., Pearl C., Kirkpatrick R. M. Planning in the Middle: Co-Planning Between General and Special Education // Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation. 2012. № 22. P. 208–226.
  6. Carless D. R. Good practices in team teaching in Japan, South Korea and Hong Kong // System 2006. № 34 (3). P. 341–351.
  7. Carless D. R., Walker E. Effective Team Teaching between Local and Native-speaking English Teachers // Language and Education. 2006. № 20 (6). P.  463–477.
  8. Carley H. F. Team teaching styles utilized in Japan: do they really work? // Journal of International Education Research. 2013. № 9 (3). P. 247–262.
  9. Carpenter D. M., Crawford L., & Walden R. Testing the efficacy of team teaching // Learning Environment Research. 2007. № 10. P. 53–65.
  10. Chang L.-C., Lee G. C. A team-teaching model for practicing project-based learning in high school: Collaboration between computer and subject teachers // Computers & Education. 2010. № 55 (3) P. 961–969.
  11. Chanmugam A., Gerlach B. A co-teaching model for developing future educators’ teaching effectiveness // International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. 2013. № 25 (1). P.  110–117.
  12. Chiasson K., Yearwood J.-A. & Olsen G. The best of both worlds: Combining ECE and ECSE philosophies and best practices through a coteaching model // Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education. 2006. № 27 (3). P. 303–312.
  13. Cremin H., Thomas G., Vincett K. Learning zones: an evaluation of three models for improving learning through teacher/teaching assistant teamwork // Support for Learning. 2003. № 18 (4). P. 145–161.
  14. Dugan K., Letterman M. Student appraisals of collaborative teaching // College Teaching. 2008. № 56 (1). P. 11–16.
  15. Gerretson H., Bosnick J., Schofield K. A Case for Content Specialists as the Elementary Classroom Teacher // The Teacher Educator. 2008. № 43 (4). P. 302–314.
  16. Graue E., Hatch K., Rao K., Oen D. The Wisdom of Class-size Reduction // American Educational Reserach Journal. 2007. № 44 (3). P. 670–700.
  17. Gurgur H., Uzuner Y. Examining the implementation of two co-teaching models: team teaching and station teaching // International Journal of Inclusive Education. 2011. № 15 (6). P. 589–610.
  18. Helms M. M., Alvis J. M., Willis M. Planning and Implementing Shared Teaching: An MBA Team-Teaching Case Study // Journal of Education for Business. 2005. № 81 (1). P. 29–34.
  19. Hildebrandt E., Marty A., Stommel S. Teamteaching – Eine Übersicht über internationale empirische Forschung I. // Lebensbegleitendes Lernen. 2015. № 2 (10). URL: http://lll21.petrsu.ru/journal/article_de.php?id=2808 (дата обращения 24.03.16).
  20. Huber B. Teamteaching. Bilanz und Perspektiven. Europäische Hochschulschriften. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, Europäischer Verlag der Wissenschaften, 2000.
  21. Jang S.-J. Research on the effects of team teaching upon two secondary school teachers // Educational Research. 2006. № 48 (2). P. 177–194.
  22. Kamens M. W., Susko J. P., Elliott J. S. Evaluation and supervision of co-teaching: a study of administrator pracices in New Jersey // NASSP Bulletin. 2013. № 97 (2). P.  166–190.
  23. King-Sears M. E., Brawand A. E., Jenkins, M. C., Preston-Smith, S. Co-teaching perspectives from secondary science co-teachers and their students with disabilities // Journal of Science Teacher Education. 2014. № 25. P. 651–680.
  24. Magiera K., Zigmond N. Co-Teaching in Middle School Classrooms under Routine Conditions: Does the Instructional Experience Differ for Students with Disabilities in Co-Taught and Solo-Taught Classes // Learning Disabilities Research and Practice. 2005. № 20 (2). P. 79–85.
  25. McCormack L., Finlayson O. E., McCloughlin T. J. J. The CASE programme implemented across the primary and secondary school transition in Ireland // International Journal of Science Education. 2014. № 36 (17). P. 2892–2917.
  26. McDuffie K. A., Mastropieri M. A., Scruggs T. E. Differential effects of peer tutoring in co-taught and non-co-taught classes: results for content learning and student-teacher interactions // Exceptional Children. 2009. № 75 (4). P. 493−510.
  27. Murata R. What does team teaching mean? A case study of interdisciplinary teaming // The Journal of Educational Research. 2002. № 96 (2). P. 67–77.
  28. Murawski W. W. Student outcomes in co-taught secondary english classes: How can we improve? // Reading & Writing Quarterly. 2006.  № 22 (3). P. 227–247.
  29. Murawski W. W., Swanson H. L. A Meta-Analysis of Co-Teaching. Where are the Data? // Remedial and Special Education. 2001. Vol. 22. №. 5. P. 258−267.
  30. Pratt S. Achieving symbiosis: working through challenges found in co-teaching to achieve effective co-teaching relationships // Teaching and Teacher Education. 2014. № 41. P. 1–12.
  31. Rivera E. A., McMahon S. D., Keys C. B. Collaborative teaching: school implementation and connections with outcomes among students with disabilities // Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community. 2014. № 42 (1). P. 72–85.
  32. Robbins C., Searby L. Exploring parental involvement strategies utilized by middle school interdisciplinary teams // School Community Journal. 2013. № 23 (2). P. 113–136.
  33. Roth W.-M., Boyd N. Coteaching, as colearning, is praxis // Research in Science Education. 1999. № 29 (1). P. 51–67.
  34. Rytivaara A., Kershner R. Co-teaching as a context for teachers’ professional learning and joint knowledge construction // Teaching and Teacher Education. 2012. № 28. P. 999–1008.
  35. Schustereit R. C. Team-Teaching and Academic Achievement // Improving College and University Teaching. 1980. № 28 (2). P. 85–89.
  36. Scruggs Th. E., Mastropieri M. A., McDuffie K. A. Co-Teaching in Inclusive Classrooms: A Metasynthesis of Qualitative Research // Council for Exceptional Children. 2007. Vol. 73. №. 4. P. 392−416.
  37. Strogilos V., Tragoulia E. Inclusive and collaborative practices in co-taught classrooms: Roles and responsibilities for teachers and parents // Teaching and Teacher Education. 2013. № 35. P. 81–91.
  38. Sweigart C. A., Landrum T. J. The impact of number of adults on instruction: implications for co-teaching // Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth. 2015. № 59 (1). P. 22–29.
  39. Tajino A., Walker L. Perspectives on team teaching by students and teachers: Exploring foundations for team learning. Language // Culture and Curriculum. 1998. № 11 (1). P. 113–131.
  40. Takala M., Uusitalo-Malmivaara L. A one-year study of the development of co-teaching in four Finnish schools // European Journal of Special Needs Education. 2012. № 27 (3). P. 373–390.
  41. Tremblay P. Comparative outcomes of two instructional models for students with learning disabilities: inclusion with co-teaching and solo-taught special education // Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs. 2013. № 13 (4). P. 251–258.
  42. Wadkins T., Miller R. L., Woszniak W. Team teaching: Student satisfaction and performance // Teaching of Psychology. 2006. № 3 (2). P. 118–120.
  43. Welch M. Descriptive analysis of team teaching in two elementary classrooms: A formative experimental approach //  Remedial and Special Education. 2000. № 21 (6). P. 366–376.
  44. Wilson G. L., Michaels C. A. General and special education students’ perception of co-teaching: implications for secondary-level literacy instruction // Reading and Writing Quarterly. 2006. № 22 (3). P. 205–225.
  45. Wöllner C., Ginsborg J. Team teaching in the conservatoire: the views of music performance staff and students // British Journal of Music Education. 2011. № 28 (3). P. 301–323.
  46. York-Barr J., Ghere G., Sommerness J. Collaborative teaching to increase all student learning: A three-year urban elementary case study // Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk. 2007. № 12 (3). P. 301–335.
  47. Zigmond N. Reading and Writing in Co-Taught Secondary School Social Studies Classrooms: A Reality Check // Reading & Writing Quarterly. 2006. № 22 (3). P. 249–268.

 

 


Displays: 7569; Downloads: 995;

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15393/j5.art.2016.3206