Gniteskaya T., Zabolotsky V. CONTINUITY OF APPROACHES IN EDUCATION: FROM METASUBJECT TRAINING TO METADISCIPLINARY EDUCATION. LIFELONG EDUCATION: The 21st Century.
2024. № 3 (47). DOI: 10.15393/j5.art.2024.9565


Issue 3 (47)

Problems of continuity of training and education in Russia
pdf-version

CONTINUITY OF APPROACHES IN EDUCATION: FROM METASUBJECT TRAINING TO METADISCIPLINARY EDUCATION

Gniteskaya Tatyana N.
Doctor of pedagogical sciences, Professor, Professor of the Department of General and Experimental Physics
Far Eastern Federal University
(Vladivostok, Russian Federation)
gnitetskaya.tn@dvfu.ru
Zabolotsky Vladimir S.
director of the Department of Mathematics, Associate Professor of the Department of Mathematics
Far Eastern Federal University
(Vladivostok, Russian Federation)
zabolotskiy.vs@dvfu.ru
Keywords:
metasubject
metasubject training
metasubject connection
interdisciplinary connection
general education
higher education.		 Abstract: the article discusses the concepts of meta-subject in education: approach, result, content. The historical aspect of the emergence of the concept of «metasubjectivity» and its understanding by the two main scientific schools studying this area are considered. A brief overview of research in the field of meta-subject teaching at the general education level is provided. The issue of integrating the principle of meta-subject into the Federal state educational standards of general education: primary, basic, secondary was discussed. Two directions of research into meta-subject matter are considered, the differences between which are associated with different approaches to fundamentality. comparative and classification analysis of subject-specific learning outcomes at the level of secondary general education and competencies at the level of higher education ‒ bachelor's degree was carried out. The low degree of study of meta-subjects at the level of higher education and the almost complete absence of approaches to modeling meta-subject connections given the current relevance of such research are shown. The relevance of meta-subject research is substantiated, taking into account the need to ensure continuity of approaches in education. The role of meta-subject modeling based on intra- and inter-subject connections at the levels of both general and higher education has been determined.
Paper submitted on: 03/23/2024; Accepted on: 08/23/2024; Published online on: 09/26/2024.

References

  1. Gromyko Yu. V. Meta-subject «Problem»: a textbook for high school students. Moscow, 1998. 382 p. (In Russ.)
  2. Gromyko Yu. V. Thought-activity pedagogy (Theoretical and practical guide to mastering the highest examples of pedagogical art). Minsk, 2000. 376 p. (In Russ.)
  3. Khutorskoy A. V. Meta-subject approach to teaching: scientific and methodological manual. Moscow, 2012. 73 p. (In Russ.)
  4. Khutorskoy A. V. Five levels of implementation of the meta-subject approach in the content of education. Narodnoe obrazovanie [Public education]. 2017. No. 8. P. 69‒80.
  5. Purysheva N. S., Romashkina N. V., Krysanova O. A. About metasubjectivity, methodology and others. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo [Bulletin of Nizhny Novgorod University named after. N. I. Lobachevsky]. 2012. No. 1-1. P. 11–17.
  6. Purysheva N. S. Krysanova O. A. Metasubject approach to methods of teaching physics. Chelyabinsk, 2013. 215 p. (In Russ.)
  7. Formation of universal educational activities in primary school: from action to thought. System of tasks: textbook allowance for general education organizations / A. G. Asmolov, G. V. Burmenskaya, I. A. Volodarskaya and others. Moscow, 2017. 159 p. (In Russ.)
  8. Dammer M. D. Metasubject content of an academic subject.  Vestnik Yuzhno-Uralskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of South Ural State University]. Ser. «Education. Pedagogical sciences». Vol. 6. No. 1. 2014. P. 46‒52. (In Russ.)
  9. Gnitetskaya T. N. Model of meta-subject communication using the example of physics. University in the era of pedagogical innovations: collection of articles based on the results of the Second Professorial Pedagogical Forum, June 1–4, 2023. Moscow, 2023. P. 113‒122. (In Russ.)
  10. Korshunova O. V. Meta-subject in modern education: essence, features, problems and implementation options.  Obrazovanie lichnosti [Personal education]. 2016. No. 4. P. 171–180. (In Russ.)
  11. Zimnyaya I. A. Key competencies ‒ a new paradigm for educational results. Eksperiment i innovacii v shkole [Experiment and innovation at school]. 2009. No. 2. P. 7‒14. (In Russ.)
  12. Gnitetskaya T. N. Afremov L. L. Theory of intra- and interdisciplinary connections. Vladivostok, 2005. 176 p. (In Russ.)

Displays: 186; Downloads: 47;

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15393/j5.art.2024.9565