Leushina N. FEEDBACK IN TEACHING READING AND WRITING IN ENGLISH TO UNIVERSITY STUDENTS. LIFELONG EDUCATION: The 21st Century.
2024. № 1 (45). DOI: 10.15393/j5.art.2024.9188


Issue 1 (45)

Innovative approaches to lifelong learning
pdf-version

FEEDBACK IN TEACHING READING AND WRITING IN ENGLISH TO UNIVERSITY STUDENTS

Leushina Nadezhda A.
a lecturer at the Department of Foreign Languages for Natural and Technical areas of study of the Institute of Foreign Languages
Petrozavodsk State University
(Petrozavodsk, Russian Federation)
nadezhda.leu@yandex.ru
Keywords:
feedback
teaching reading and writing in English
information and communications technology
higher education.		 Abstract: the article is aimed at studying the problem of providing quality feedback to improve skills in summarising in writing in English, which is one of the key academic skills. In the context of lifelong education, the relevance of the study is determined by the need to provide students with a constructive feedback to overcome the problems, as well as to motivate students. The purpose of the study is to compare the results of providing feedback with the use of ICT and the ones yielded through the traditional approach.
The study was carried out using the following theoretical methods: review of academic and methodological literature, analysis, synthesis, study of teaching experience, as well as the method of educational experiment. Teaching second-year non-linguistic students to write in English was organized with the use of Write & Improve, a digital tool with internal (information about individual results is sent to each student) and external (students’ digital footprint available to the lecturer) feedback. In ICT-based training, students received written feedback both from the digital tool (internal feedback) and from their lecturer through the same electronic resource, while in the traditional approach the feedback was provided only from the lecturer in the form of written and oral comments.
The study confirmed the efficiency of using an electronic resource with internal feedback. According to the criteria listed in the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR), the students achieved higher results in processing text in writing in English when studying with a digital tool rather than in the traditional approach. The article suggests the following ad-vantages of using the electronic resource: objective assessment of students’ written texts according to the CEFR scale, possible individualization of the pedagogical impact, and the opportunity to intensify extracurricular work of students and save time.
Paper submitted on: 11/17/2023; Accepted on: 02/14/2024; Published online on: 03/21/2024.

References

  1. Korenev A. A. Feedback in learning and pedagogical communication. Rema [Rhema]. 2018. No. 2. P. 112‒127. (In Russ.)
  2. Azbel A. A., Ilyushin L. S., Kazakova E. I., Morozova P. A. Teachers’ and  students’ attitudes towards feedback: Contradictions and development trends. Obrazovanie i nauka [The Education and Science Journal]. 2022. Vol. 24. No. 7. P. 76‒109. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2022-7-76-109 (In Russ.)
  3. Solovov A. V., Menshikova A.A. Models of design and functioning of digital educational environments. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. 2021. Vol. 30. No. 1. P. 144‒155. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2021-30-1-144-155 (In Russ.)
  4. Klets T. E. Feedback as a means of diagnosing the pedagogical results of foreign language interactive communication. Trudy Pskovskogo politekhnicheskogo instituta [Proceedings of the Pskov State Polytechnic Institute]. 2011. Vol. 1. No. 15. P. 82‒87. (In Russ.)
  5. Mussaui-Ul'yanishcheva E. V., Ul'yanishcheva L. V. Realization of corrective feedback in teaching a foreign language at a university. Mir nauki, kul'tury, obrazovaniya [The World of Science, Culture and Education]. 2021. No. 3 (88). P. 168‒170. (In Russ.)
  6. Bugreeva A. S. Problems of implementing effective feedback as a motivation tool in teaching a foreign language. Mir nauki, kul'tury, obrazovaniya [The World of Science, Culture and Education]. 2023. No. 1 (98). P. 5‒8. (In Russ.)
  7. Titova S. V., Barinova K. V. Feedback and reflection in foreign language teaching. Vestnik Mosk. un-ta. Ser. 19. Lingvistika i mezhkul'turnaya kommunikatsiya [Moscow University Bulletin. Series 19: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication]. 2021. No. 2. P. 200‒214. (In Russ.)
  8. Bogolepova S. V., Kirsanova M. A., Pivovarova A. A. As you give, you will receive? Language students’ attitudes to peer-assessment and feedback. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Tomsk State University Journal]. 2023. No. 487. P. 118–128. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/487/14 (In Russ.)
  9. Hattie J. Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. 1st ed. Routledge. London, 2008. 392 p. DOI: 10.4324/9780203887332
  10. Avis J., Fisher R., Thompson R. (eds.) Teaching in lifelong learning: A guide to theory. New York, 2010. 303 p.
  11. Black P., Harrison C., Lee C., Marshall B., Wiliam D. Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. Maidenhead, 2003. 152 p.
  12. Vorotilkina I. M. Students’ independence in the educational process. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. 2012. No. 3. P. 92‒97. (In Russ.)
  13. Common European Framework of Reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment – Companion volume. Strasbourg, 2020. 278 p.
  14. Galskova N. D., Gez N. I. Theory of teaching foreign languages. Linguodidactics and methodology: A textbook. 3rd ed. Moscow, 2006. 336 p. (In Russ.)
  15. Oxford advanced learner's dictionary: With Oxford writing tutor. Oxford, 2010. 1796 p.

 


Displays: 382; Downloads: 92;

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15393/j5.art.2024.9188