KUZMENKO M., KAZKO E. THE STUDY OF THE TEACHERS PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCIES ASSESSMENT AND SELF-ASSESSMENT. LIFELONG EDUCATION: The 21st Century.
2023. № 2 (42). DOI: 10.15393/j5.art.2023.8468


Issue 2 (42)

Human and teaching resources of continuing education
pdf-version

THE STUDY OF THE TEACHERS PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCIES ASSESSMENT AND SELF-ASSESSMENT

KUZMENKO Maria V.
PhD in Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Theory and Methods of Primary Education, Institute of Pedagogy and Psychology
Petrozavodsk State University
(Petrozavodsk, Russian Federation)
kuzm476@mail.ru
KAZKO Elena S.
PhD in Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Theory and Methods of Primary Education, Institute of Pedagogy and Psychology
Petrozavodsk State University
helenkazko@gmail.com
Keywords:
competencies
professional competencies
teacher competencies
graduate competencies
primary school teachers
future teachers
graduates of a pedagogical university
self-assessment of competencies.		 Abstract: the article presents the results of a study aimed at the assessment of disciplinary and methodological professional competencies of future primary school teachers, as well as reflexive skills in the field of self-assessment of relevant competencies. The assessment methods were testing and questioning of graduate students using diagnostic materials. The data obtained as a result of the study allowed us to draw the following conclusions about the level of formation of professional competencies among graduates: the majority (58 %) of students have an acceptable level; 15 % of graduates correspond to the threshold level of formation of professional competencies; 27 % of students have reached the highest, optimal level. The analysis of the results of students' self-assessment of professional competencies showed that only 50% of students adequately assessed their competencies, 40% of graduates are characterized by overestimated self-esteem and 10 % of graduates are characterized by underestimated self-esteem. Self-assessment of methodological competencies was carried out by students more successfully and accurately than subject competencies.
A comparative analysis of the results of self-assessment in the tasks of the subject and methodological part allows us to conclude that the indicators are quite similar and consistent both for complex tasks and for those that caused minor difficulties. There is no direct relationship between the success of tasks and the success of self-assessment. The results of the study made it possible to determine the deficits of the future teachers’ subject-methodical competence, the main professional difficulties of graduates of pedagogical universities. The study revealed a number of problems and relevant areas for improving the training of future primary school teachers, in particular, the need to: adjust the content of work programs in specialized disciplines, pedagogical practice programs, taking into account the identified professional deficits; purposeful development of graduates' reflexive skills in the field of self -assessment of professional activity.
Paper submitted on: 02/12/2023; Accepted on: 04/24/2023; Published online on: 06/26/2023.

References

  1. Temnyatkina O. V, Tokmeninova D. V. Modern approaches to teacher performance assessment an overview of foreign publications. Voprosy obrazovaniya [Educational Studies]. 2018. No. 3. P. 180‒195. DOI: 10.17323/1814-9545-2018-3-180-195 (In Russ.)
  2. Gadusova Z., Haskova A., Predanocyova E. Teachers' professional competence and their evaluation. Education and Self-Development. 2019. Vol. 14. No. 3. P. 17‒24. DOI: doi.org/10.26907/esd14.3.02
  3. Gadušova Z. Haskova A., Szarszoi D. Teachers` competences evaluation: Case study. Science for Education Today. 2020. Vol. 10. No. 3. P. 164‒177. DOI: doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2003.09
  4. Haskova A., Lukacova D., Noga H. Teacher self-assessment as a part of quality management.  Science for Education Today. 2019. Vol. 9. No. 2. P. 156‒169. DOI: doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.1902.11
  5. Martínez J. F., Schweig J., Goldschmidt P. Approaches for combining multiple measures of teacher performance. Reliability, validity, and implications for evaluation policy [Electronic resource]. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 2016. Vol. 3. Is. 4. P. 738‒756. Electron dan. URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3102/0162373716666166 (date of acсess 10.02.23).
  6. Huber S. G., Skedsmo G. Teacher evaluation-accountability and improving teaching practices. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability. 2016. Vol. 28. Is. 2. P. 105‒109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-016-9241-1
  7. Slowik J., Peskova M., Shatunova O. V., Bartus E. V. The competences of young teachers in education of pupils with special educational needs. Obrazovanie I nayka [The Education and science journal]. Vol. 22. No. 10. P. 139‒160. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2020-10-139-160 (In Russ.)
  8. Kleshcheva I. V., Snegurova V. I., Stefanova N. L. Results of the study on the subject-methodological competence of mathematics teachers.  Biznes. Obrazovanie. Pravo [Business. Education. Right]. 2022. No. 1 (58). P. 265‒271. DOI: 10.25683/VOLBI.2022.58.114 (In Russ.)
  9. Kupriyanovа T. V. Establishing the national system of teacher development: legal and social issues. Psiholodicheskaya nayka I obrazovanie [Psychological science and education]. 2017. Vol. 22. No. 4. P. 22‒26. DOI: 10.17759/pse.2017220404 (In Russ.)
  10. Pisareva S. A., Puchkov M. Y., Rivkina S. V., Tryapitsina A. P. Teachers’ professional competence: the model of level-based assessment. Science for Education Today. 2019. Vol. 9. No. 3. P. 151‒168. DOI: 10.15293/2658-6762.1903.09 (In Russ.)
  11. Pashkin S.B., Lisovskaya N. B., Korablina E. P., Sivak A. N., Turchin A. S. Factors of psychological readiness of pedagogical university graduates for professional activities. Perspektivy nayki I obrazovaniya [Perspectives of science and education]. 2020. No. 6 (48). P. 358‒373. DOI: 10.32744/pse.2020.6.28 (In Russ.)
  12. Kuzmenko M. V., Kazko E. S. Readiness of future primary teachers to professional activities: assessment of subject and methodological competencies. Nepreryvnoe obrazovanie: XXI vek [Lifelong Education: The 21st Century]. 2022. No. 2 (38). DOI: 10.15393/j5.art.2022.7629 (In Russ.)
  13. Belolutskaya A. K., Krishtofik I. S., Mkrtchyan V. A. Features of professional activity reflection of the olympiad «I am a professional» participants. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. 2022. Vol. 31. No. 1. P. 98‒119. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2022-31-1-98-119 (In Russ.)
  14. Simonova G. I., Konysheva A. V., Kotryahov N. V. Peculiarities of reflexive position formation in students within educational process at the university by information-and-communication technologies. Perspektivy nayki I obrazovaniya [Perspectives of science and education]. 2018. No. 6 (36). P. 65‒73. DOI: 10.32744/pse.2018.6.7 (In Russ.)
  15. Margolis A. A., Safronova M. A., Panfilova A. S., Shishlyannikova L. M. Testing of assessment tools of future teachers’ professional competence. Psiholodicheskaya nayka I obrazovanie [Psychological science and education]. 2015. Vol. 20. No. 5. P. 77‒91. DOI: 10.17759/pse.2015200507 (In Russ.)
  16. Orekhova T. F., Neretina T. G., Kondrashova E. N. Formulation of scientific concepts as a component of the research competence of future teachers. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher Education in Russia]. 2019. Vol. 28. No. 6. P. 149‒157. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-6-149-157 (In Russ.)
  17. Nagovitsyn R. S., Golubeva I. A. Forming future teachers' communicative competences through the student scientific society activities.  Integratsiya obrazovaniya [Integration of Education]. 2019.  Vol. 23. No. 1(94). P. 66‒84. DOI: 10.15507/1991-9468.094.023.201901.066-084 (In Russ.)
  18. Margolis A. A., Safronova M. A., Panfilova A. S., Shishlyannikova L. M. Outcomes of independent evaluation of general professional competencies in future teachers. Psiholodicheskaya nayka I obrazovanie [Psychological science and education]. 2018. Vol. 23. No. 1. P. 64‒81. DOI: 10.17759/pse.2018230106 (In Russ.)
  19. Mazilov V. A., Slepko Y. N.  Development of the psychological system of pedagogical abilities of students ‒ future primary school teachers. Integratsiya obrazovaniya [Integration of Education]. 2021. Vol. 25. No. 3 (104). P. 463‒481. DOI: 10.15507/1991-9468.104.025.202103.463-481 (In Russ.)
  20. Budnikova S. P. Evaluation by graduates of pedagogical universities their readiness for professional pedagogical activity.  Psiholodicheskaya nayka I obrazovanie [Psychological science and education]. 2018. Vol. 23. No. 5. P. 112‒123. DOI:  10.17759/pse.2018230511 (In Russ.)
  21. Smolyaninova O. G., Rostovtseva M. V., Yudina Yu. G. [et al.]. Project-Based Activity as a Mechanism of Reflection Developmentin Students of Psychology and Education Studies. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities and Social Sciences. 2021. Vol. 14. No. 3. P. 385‒395. DOI: 10.17516/1997-1370-0730

Displays: 401; Downloads: 80;

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15393/j5.art.2023.8468