Pomnikova A. Y. EDUCATIONAL POTENTIAL OF FAMILY STORIES AS A TYPE OF COMMUNICATION. LIFELONG EDUCATION: The 21st Century.
2021. № 2 (34). DOI: 10.15393/j5.art.2021.6931


Issue 2 (34)

Innovative approaches to lifelong learning

pdf-version

EDUCATIONAL POTENTIAL OF FAMILY STORIES AS A TYPE OF COMMUNICATION

Pomnikova Anna Yu.
PhD in Linguistics, Associate professor, Department of Russian as a foreign language
Far Eastern Federal University
(Vladivostok, Russian Federation)
pomnikova_a@mail.ru
Keywords:
personal development; subjectivity; educational environment; continuing education; subjective approach; systems approach
Abstract: the personality and developmental potential of the continuous education environment in the internal affairs bodies on the basis of the subjective approach is investigated. The article is based on the results of the author's research, which revealed tendencies towards a contradiction between the meaningfulness of life guidelines of employees of internal affairs bodies, their focus on education and the expressiveness of their reflexivity. The personal development potential of the lifelong learning environment is considered within the frames of personal and environmental interaction strategies. The status positions of the personality do not strictly correlate with the developed personality, although they can act as prerequisites for the development. We regard the personal development in the aspect of the social essence of a person as associated with the ability to self-justification, self-determination, and self-realization. The characteristic of personality self-realization is expressed by the dynamics of the subject-personal position of adults in the service and educational environment (in the refraction of the properties of personality development – heterochronism, eventivity, and situationalness). The dialectical accumulation and resolution of personal contradictions accompanies a qualitatively new level of personal development, therefore, it should accompany the desired result of the person's retention in the educational environment. Reflexivity in the personal organization acts as a connecting element between the subjective perception of activity and the very possibility of development. In the subordination and disciplinary space of the profession, legal norms claim the role of a moral imperative. A pragmatic approach to assessing the personal development of an employee of the internal affairs bodies does not exclude the recognition of a positive stable state of a personal organization in accordance with the corporate pattern. At the same time, the strategies of the personal development of adults are assessed by us as unfavorable when high values of life-meaning orientations are demonstrated with a negative correlation with reflexivity.
Paper submitted on: 02/15/2021; Accepted on: 04/30/2021; Published online on: 06/26/2021.

References

 

  1. Berulava M. N., Berulava G. A. The theory of network education. In: Professional'noeobrazovanie. 2012. № 5. P. 7–11. (In Russ.)
  2. Bordovskaya N. V. Dialectics of teacher education. Saint-Petersburg, 2001. 511 p. (In Russ.)
  3. Valeeva R. A., Biktagirova G. F. Problems of family and family education in the works of Tatar educators G. Bubi and R. Fakhretdin. In: Obrazovanie i Samorazvitie. 2015. № 1 (43). P. 44–47. (In Russ.)
  4. Gabdulkhakov V. F., Murtazina L. T., Yagudina R. I. About the modern education system and the traditional pedagogical culture of Tatars. In: Obrazovanie i Samorazvitie. 2011. № 6 (28). P. 184–190. (In Russ.)
  5. Gazizova F. G. Conceptual model of the ethic and educational system of a village school. In: Obrazovanie i Samorazvitie. 2009. № 6 (16). P. 167–172. (In Russ.)
  6. Gayazov A. S. To construct one’s future from the view of generations’ historical memory (about the concepts of Small Homeland, Big Homeland and the familistic culture of a person). In: Problemy vostokovedenija. 2016. № 1 (71). P. 8–15. (In Russ.)
  7. Gorodilina М. V. Dialogue with your family history: international research experience. In: Pedagogika i psihologija obrazovanija. 2017. № 2. P. 110–119. (In Russ.)
  8. Guzenina S. V. The role of family in patriotic education of a person. In: Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Serija: Obshhestvennye nauki. 2015. № 1. P. 53–59. (In Russ.)
  9. Gusakovsky M. A. About the education at the modern university: the change of the rules of the acting. In: Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. 2015. № 1. P. 76–86. (In Russ.)
  10. Demakova I. D. Pedagogical education in the context of implementing the strategy of the education’s development. In: Obrazovanie i Samorazvitie. 2015. № 2 (44). P. 128–135. (In Russ.)
  11. Desyaev S. N. The space of patriotism. In: Integracija obrazovanija. 2004. № 3. P. 65–71. (In Russ.)
  12. Dobrovolskaya L. V. Problems of introduction folk musical traditions to younger schoolchildren of Kazakhstan. In: Obrazovanie i nauka. 2013. № 5 (104). P. 150–160. (In Russ.)
  13. Domnin S. S. Parenting and education in a merchant family of the cities of the Mari Territory in the 19th century. In: Obrazovanie i Samorazvitie. 2010. № 4 (20). P. 165–170. (In Russ.)
  14. Dridger K. A. The concept of national education in the modern educational process. In: Obrazovanie i Samorazvitie. 2009. № 1 (1). P. 196–201. (In Russ.)
  15. Ermolaeva E. B. The main characteristics of dialogical interaction (to the definition of relevant objectives of dialogue pedagogy). In: Obrazovanie i nauka. 2012. № 7. P. 18–34. (In Russ.)
  16. Zaika L. V. Introduction to family life course in 7–8th grades: first outcomes. In: Vestnik GOU DPO TO «IPK I PPRO TO». In: Tul'skoe obrazovatel'noe prostranstvo. 2017. № 3. P. 20–22. (In Russ.)
  17. Zakirova A. F., Volodina Ye. N. Trends and prospects of educational modernization: a hermeneutic approach. In: Obrazovanie i nauka. 2018. № 20 (9). P. 9–34. (In Russ.)
  18. Igolkin K. S., Domrachev S. S. Citizens’ awareness of their family history as a mechanism of forming social and historical memory. In:  Socium i vlast'. 2016. № 5 (61). P. 43–48. (In Russ.)
  19. Izvekov I. N., Zimovina O. A. The technology of networking cooperation between members of educational space in educating of a pupil. In: Professional'noe obrazovanie i obshhestvo. 2015. № 4 (16). P. 6–22. (In Russ.)
  20. Khaled A. Nurturing the growing generation’s values in the process of socio-cultural transformation of society. In: Obrazovanie i nauka. 2012. № 7 (96). P. 79–90. (In Russ.)
  21. Litvinova О. V. The problem of forming family identity as a non-conflict factor of intergenerational interaction in family. In: Lichnost', sem'ja i obshhestvo: voprosy pedagogiki i psihologii. 2014. № 36. P. 219–223. (In Russ.)
  22. Mezentseva Yu. I., Gorlov М. I. Traditional family values and modern education. In: Nauchnoe obozrenie: gumanitarnye issledovanija. 2017. № 5. P. 86–90. (In Russ.)
  23. Omel’chenko Е. L., Andreeva Yu. V. What remains in the family history: the memory of «The Soviet» in the conversation of three generations. Sociologicheskie issledovanija. 2017. № 11. P. 147–156. (In Russ.)
  24. Boele A.et al. Distant relatives? Demographic determinants of long-term developments in intergenerational proximity, the Netherlands 1650–1899. In: The History of the Family. 2018. Vol. 23 (3). P. 359–387.
  25. Guzmán R. The transnational life and letters of the Venegas family, 1920s to 1950s. In: The History of the Family. 2016. Vol. 21 (3). P. 457–482.
  26. Huisman D. M. Telling a Family Culture: Storytelling, Family Identity, and Cultural Membership. In: Interpersona. 2014. Vol. 8 (2). P. 144–158.
  27. Martín L. M. Shared letters: writing and reading practices in the correspondence of migrant families in northern Spain. In: The History of the Family. 2016. Vol. 21 (3). P. 429–456.
  28. Mehta D. ‘An Autobiographical Myth’: Recuperating History in Suniti Namjoshi’s Goja. In: Life Writing. 2019. Vol. 16 (4). P. 583–599.
  29. Miller-Day M. Family Communication [Electronic resource]. In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. 2017. Electron dan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.177 (date of access 17.08.2020).
  30. Paiva D., de Matos T. P., Fonseca M. To stay or to migrate: siblings and life transitions in 19th century Ribeira Seca, Azores. In: The History of the Family. 2018. Vol. 23 (4). P. 568–593.
  31. Prins E. Digital storytelling in adult education and family literacy: a case study from rural Ireland. In:  Learning, Media and Technology. 2017. Vol. 42 (3). Р. 308–323.
  32. Riswick T., Engelen Th. Siblings and life transitions: investigating the resource dilution hypothesis across historical contexts and outcomes. In: The History of the Family. 2018. Vol. 23 (4). P. 521–532.
  33. Roikonen P., Häkkinen A. Generations, social homogamy and stratification in Finland, 1700–1910. In: The History of the Family. 2018. Vol. 23. P. 1–27.
  34. Rosenbaum-Feldbrügge M. Gender differences in response to family crisis: changes in household composition and migration of widowed parents with minor children in the Netherlands, 1863–1910. In: The History of the Family. 2018. Vol. 23 (4). P. 679–705.
  35. Zhou W., Wen Ch., Dai L. Collaborative construction of social-oriented family archives: a case study based on the practice of China. In: Archives and Records. 2020. Vol. 41 (1). P. 52–67.


Displays: 959; Downloads: 228;

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15393/j5.art.2021.6931