Koshkarov V. L. STEREOTYPE VS ORIGINALITY IN COMMUNICATION AND LEARNING. LIFELONG EDUCATION: The 21st Century.
2018. № 2 (22). DOI: 10.15393/j5.art.2018.3972


Issue 2 (22)

Discussion platform
pdf-version

STEREOTYPE VS ORIGINALITY IN COMMUNICATION AND LEARNING

Koshkarov V L
Ph.D in Philology
associate professor of the Department of the Theory and Methodology of Primary Education at PetrSu
(Petrozavodsk, Russia)
astiko54@mail.ru
Keywords:
stereotype
originality
communication
learn
speech activity
language as a system.		 Abstract: the attempt is made to define the «spheres of influence» of stereotype and stereopization as a dominant tendency in the approach for «speech skills development» of school and university students. We also tried to find the ways to create conditions for manifestation of learners’ independence in productive speech activities. We oriented it not on the outside patterns but on the self-expression of a linguistic persona. We consider that sooner or later it will promote to develop value-based attitude to their speech and the language, which is shown in the first place in striving to make the speech less stereotypical, different from others, original. Stereotypic base (language as a system) serves as an instrument for expressing intellectual-emotional personality content («by default» − unique), − this combination may serve as the source of pedagogical objective to make speech cliché-free.
Paper submitted on: 05/04/2018; Accepted on: 05/24/2018; Published online on: 06/25/2018.

References

  1. Aleksandrova Z. E. Slovar' sinonimov russkogo jazyka. M.: Russkij jazyk, 2001. 567 s.
  2. Bol'shoj tolkovyj slovar' russkogo jazyka / Sost., gl. red. S. A. Kuznecov. SPb.: Norint, 2000. 1535 s.
  3. Bol'shoj psihologicheskij slovar' / Sost. i obshh. red. B. Meshherjakov, V. Zinchenko. SPb.: Prajm-Evroznak, 2003. 632 s.
  4. Vezhbicka A. Iz knigi «Semanticheskie primitivy»: Vvedenie // Semiotika / Sost., vstup. st. i obshh. red. Ju. S. Stepanova. M.: Raduga, 1983. S. 225–252.
  5. Gasparov M. L. Izbrannye trudy. T. VI. Lingvistika stiha. Analizy i interpretacii. M.: Jazyki slavjanskoj kul'tury, 2012. 720 s.
  6. Goroshko E. I. Integrativnaja model' svobodnogo associativnogo jeksperimenta. M., Har'kov: Ra-Karavella, 2001. 320 s.
  7. Dvoreckij I. H. Latinsko-russkij slovar'. M.: Russkij jazyk, 1976. 1096 s.
  8. Zhinkin, N. I. Rech' kak provodnik informacii. M.: Nauka, 1982. 155 s.
  9. Karaulov Ju. N. Russkij jazyk i jazykovaja lichnost'. M.: Izd-vo LKI, 2010. 264 s.
  10. Koshkarov V. L. Obuchenie rechevoj dejatel'nosti v shkole na osnove perekodirovanija [Jelektronnyj resurs]: Ucheb. jelektron. posobie dlja obuchajushhihsja po napravleniju podgotovki «Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie». Petrozavodsk: Izd-vo PetrGU, 2017. URL: http://elibrary.karelia.ru/docs/koshkarov/obuchen_rech_dejat_v_shkole_na%20osn_perekod/total.pdf (data obrashhenija 28.05.2018).
  11. Kurpatov A. V. Rukovodstvo po sistemnoj povedencheskoj psihoterapii. Rostov-na Donu: Feniks, 2013. 571 s.
  12. Slovar' sinonimov i antonimov sovremennogo russkogo jazyka / Pod red. A. S. Gavrilovoj. M.: Adelant, 2013. 800 s.
  13. Chernyh P. Ja. Istoriko-jetimologicheskij slovar' sovremennogo russkogo jazyka. T. 1. M.: Russkij jazyk, 1999. 622 s.

 




Displays: 3189; Downloads: 606;

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15393/j5.art.2018.3972