Bashmanova E. L. THE FAMILY ROLE IN MITIGATION OF SOCIAL CONSEQUENCES OF TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION FOR STUDENTS. LIFELONG EDUCATION: The 21st Century.
2017. № 4 (20). DOI: 10.15393/j5.art.2017.3767


Issue 4 (20)

Innovative approaches to lifelong learning

pdf-version

THE FAMILY ROLE IN MITIGATION OF SOCIAL CONSEQUENCES OF TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION FOR STUDENTS

Bashmanova Elena L.
Doctor of pedagogical sciences, Associate professor
Professor of the Chair of Education of the Kursk State University
(Kursk, Russia)
bashmanovaelena@yandex.ru
Keywords:
technological innovations
precariat
regional educational policy
family
professional choice
professional self-determination.
Abstract: The purpose of the article is to draw attention to the social and pedagogical consequences of the spread of technological innovations which lead to dramatic changes in the structure of employment. Using the metaphor of the "snowball" by W. Buffett and the concept of "tragedy of status frustration" by H. Standing, the author emphasizes the special vulnerability of young people from the Russian regions in terms of the prospect of replenishing the precariat ranks. The article shows that in the situation of professional choosing the family is able to perform the function of a facilitator, but often does not have the intellectual, material and financial resources. This is evidenced by the data of a poll of senior pupils and their parents "Professional self-determination of high school students: problems and prospects", held in different districts of Kursk city of in order to determine the potential of the family in supporting their children. As the results of the research showed, parents are included in the process of life and professional self-determination of schoolchildren, they are eager to help them, but realize the limitations of resources. The author proposed to develop: 1. a model of parental competence in supporting children; 2. an education system to adapt parents to new social relations; 3 methods of diagnosis parent readiness to support children, 4. monitoring the resource provision of the family with the aim of providing it with comprehensive assistance.
Paper submitted on: 11/30/2017; Accepted on: 12/05/2017; Published online on: 12/22/2017.

References

1.    Analiz normativnogo podushevogo finansirovaniya obshchego obrazovaniya v sub"ektah Rossijskoj Federacii / I.V. Abankina, M.YU. Alashkevich, V.A. Vinarik, P.V. Derkachev, M.V. Merkulov, S.S. Slavin, L.M. Filatova. M.: NIU VSHEH, 2016. 64 s.

2.    Belyaeva L.A., Korepanov G.S., Kucev G.F., Lapin N.I. Tyumenskij region v sovremennoj faze sociokul'turnoj ehvolyucii Rossii // Mir Rossii. 2008. № 1. S. 50-88.

3.    Berdyaev N.A. Filosofiya neravenstva. M.: AST Moskva: Hranitel', 2006. 349 s.

4.    V rossijskom obrazovanii mnogo pechalej, no i pozitivnye sdvigi est' // Portal NIU VSHEH. Novosti. 26.06.14. https://www.hse.ru/news/edu/126948280.html (data obrashcheniya: 27.04.17).

5.    Druzhilov S.A. Prekariat i neformal'naya trudovaya zanyatost' v Rossii: social'no-psihologicheskie aspekty // EHlektronnyj nauchno-prakticheskij zhurnal «Gumanitarnye nauchnye issledovaniya». 2015. № 1. URL: http://human.snauka.ru/2015/01/9491 (data obrashcheniya: 25.11.17).

6.    Interv'yu professora kafedry ehkonomicheskoj i social'noj geografii Rossii MGU Natal'i Zubarevich IA «Bankfaks» // Sajt IA «Bankfaks». URL: https://www.bankfax.ru/opinions/100174/ (data obrashcheniya: 17.10.2017).

7.    Kak uderzhat' molodezh' v regione? // Rossijskij soyuz molodezhi. URL: http://www.ruy.ru/press/guestroom/kak-uderzhat-molodezh-v-region/ (data obrashcheniya: 04.10.2017).

8.    Klimov E.A. Psihologiya professional'nogo samoopredeleniya. M.: Izdatel'skij centr «Akademiya», 2004. 304 s.

9.    Kogaj E.A., Kogaj A.A. Dva trenda pervichnoj modernizacii regionov. Central'noe CHernozem'e // SOCIS. 2015. № 3. S. 37-44.

10.  Kogaj E.A. Sem'ya v provincial'nom regione i vyzovy modernizacii // V mire nauchnyh otkrytij. 2013. № 11.6 (47). S.74-79.

11.  Kolesnikova I.A. Pedagogicheskoe voproshanie o cheloveke budushchego // Nepreryvnoe obrazovanie: XXI vek. Vypusk 2(10). 2015. URL: http://lll21.petrsu.ru/journal/article.php?id=2803 (data obrashcheniya: 13.02.2016).

12.  Lapin N.I. Trevozhnaya stabilizaciya // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2007. № 6. S. 39-53.

13.  Merton R. Social'naya teoriya i social'naya struktura. M.: AST, 2006. 873 s.

14.  Novaya tekhnologicheskaya revolyuciya: vyzovy i vozmozhnosti dlya Rossii. EHkspertno-analiticheskij doklad. Moskva, 2017. 136 S.

15.  Nussbaum M. Ne radi pribyli: zachem demokratii nuzhny gumanitarnye nauki. M.: Izd. dom Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki, 2014. 192 s.

16.  Pashkov A.G. Eshche raz o gumanitarnyh osnovah vospitaniya: real'nost' i nadezhdy // Uchenye zapiski: ehlektronnyj nauchnyj zhurnal Kurskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2012. № 4(24). T. 1. URL: http://scientific-notes.ru/pdf/027-013.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 02.09.2017).

17.  Pryazhnikov N.S. Professional'noe samoopredelenie: teoriya i praktika. M.: Izdatel'skij centr «Akademiya», 2008. 320 s.

18.  Rossijskie uchitelya v svete issledovatel'skih dannyh. Monografiya. M.: Izd. Dom VSHEH, 2016. 320 s.

19.  Sidorkin A.M. Aspirantov vytashchat iz «temnyh uglov» // Portal NIU VSHEH. Novosti ot 16.04.2014. URL: https://www.hse.ru/news/edu/120620838.html (data obrashcheniya: 14.01.2017).

20.  Stehnding G. Prekariat: novyj opasnyj klass. M.: Ad Marginem Press, 2014. 328 s.

21.  YAmburg E.A. Besposhchadnyj uchitel': pedagogika non-fiction. M.: Boslen, 2017. 464 s.

22.  Kreariat vs prekariat, w którym grasz zespole? // INTERIA.praca. 26.03.12. http://praca.interia.pl/news-kreariat-vs-prekariat-w-ktorym-grasz-zespole,nId,723710 (data obrashcheniya: 23.11.17).


Displays: 3960; Downloads: 742;

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15393/j5.art.2017.3767