Frayssinhes J. Digital network learning: cooperation, collaboration and pedagogical innovations. LIFELONG EDUCATION: The 21st Century.
2016. № 4 (16). DOI: 10.15393/

Issue 4 (16)

Modern scientific vocabulary of lifelong learning


Digital network learning: cooperation, collaboration and pedagogical innovations

Frayssinhes Jean
Professor of Marketing and International Trade Researcher in ODL, Mathetic and Andragogie in Joint Research Unit: Education, Training, Labour and Knowledge. The University of Toulouse Jean-Jaurès
Abstract: the new terms which have appeared in the field of modern education (including e-learning) are considered in the article. The author uses the method of critical semantic reflection and also the results of both his research work and teaching practice. The comparative analysis of the following concepts − e-learning, cooperative learning, collaborative learning, blended learning and inverse learning − are presented in the article. The issue of the legitimacy of including them in the educational innovations is brought up. Special attention is given to open distance learning in digital networks. The author emphasizes the fact that although today the development of computer providing allows everyone to receive education with the help of digital networks, nevertheless, the e-learning investigations show that successful learning on a one-on-one basis with a computer is a complicated process and not appropriate for everybody. Cooperation and collaboration are viewed as specific forms of interaction and partnership that might be used both in intramural and distance models of learning. The principles of cooperation learning are enumerated. Comparing the nature of radical (crucial, breaking-through) and incremental (gradual, step-by-step) innovations, the author comes to the conclusion that in modern education the innovations able to change principally (revolutionarily) the system of education having been developed in the millennia (the knowledge transfer from a teacher to a learner) are practically non existent. In order to identify the innovation in the process of learning the author proposes to define the features of «standard practice» and create the relevant system of evaluation to test the relative (comparative) advantages of a new educational practice in comparison with the «standard» norm. The article calls for discussion and will be of interest for the researches working in the field of the educational innovation theory and for the specialists engaged in developing the systems of network learning.
Paper submitted on: 10/16/2016; Accepted on: 11/16/2016; Published online on: 12/20/2016.

  1. Albéro, B. Linard, M. & Robin, J-Y. (2008). Petite fabrique de l’innovation à l’université.Paris: L’Harmattan, collection Logiques sociales.
  2. Blandin, B. (1990). Formateurs et formations multimédias.Paris: Édition d’Organisation.
  3. Clarke, J., Wideman, R. & Eadie, S. (1992). Apprenons ensemble : l'apprentissage coopératif en groupes restreints. Montréal : Les Éditions de la Chenelière.
  4. Cohen, E.G. (1994). Le travail de groupe : stratégies d'enseignement pour la classe hétérogène. Mon￾tréal : Les Éditions de la Chenelière.
  5. Dasgupta, S. (2003). Innovation in the Social Sciences : Herbert A. Simon and the birth of a research tradition. Dans L.V. Shavinina (dir.), The International Handbook on Innovation (p. 458- 470).Oxford: Elsevier.
  6. Devalan, P . (2006). L’innovation de rupture, clé de la compétitivité.Paris: Lavoisier
  7. Frayssinhes J. (2011). Les pratiques d’apprentissage des adultes en FOAD : Effet des styles et de l’autoapprentissage. Thèse de doctorat. Université de Toulouse II Le Mirail. Thèse en ligne :
  8. Frayssinhes J. (2012). L’apprenant adulte à l’ère du numérique.Paris: L’Harmattan.
  9. Frayssinhes, J. (2016). La Mathétique : concept transdisciplinaire de l’apprentissage sur les ré- seaux numériques. Présences, revue transdisci￾plinaire d’étude des pratiques psychosociales UQAR. Vol. 8. Repéré à es_vol8_frayssinhes_theorisation_de_la_ mathé- tique.pdf
  10. Gannaway, D., Hinton, T., Berry, B. & Moore, K. (2013). Cultivating change : disseminating innovation in higher education teaching and learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 50(4), 410-421
  11. Glickman, V. (2002). La “E-formation” entre globalisation des produits et pluralité des services », Actes du colloque (2001). Bogues. Globalisme et pluralisme. Montréal : GRICIS.
  12. Howden, J., et Martin. H. (1997). La coopération au fil des jours. Montréal : Les Éditions de la Chenelière.
  13. Jaillet, A. (2004). L’école à l’ère numérique.Paris: L’harmattan.
  14. Johnson, D.W. & Johnson R.T. (1989). Co-operation and Competition : Theory and Research.Edina,MN: Interaction Book Company
  15. Keegan, D. (1993) . Theorical principals of distance education.New York: Routledge.
  16. Lagrange, J.-B. et Grugeon,B. (2003). Vers une prise en compte de la complexité de l'usage des TIC dans l'enseignement. Revue française de pédagogie, 143, 101-111.
  17. Levy, P. (1997). L’intelligence collective. Pour une anthropologie du cyberespace.Paris: Edition La Découverte.
  18. Lungren-Cayrol, K. & Henri, F. (2001). Apprentissage collaboratif à distance : pour comprendre et con￾cevoir les environnements d'apprentissage virtuels. Sainte-Foy (Québec,Canada) : Presses de l'Université du Québec.
  19. McLoughlin, C. (1999). The implications of the research literature on learning styles for the design of instructional material. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 15(3), 22-241.
  20. Piombo, C. (2007). Modélisation probabiliste du style d’apprentissage et application à l’adaptation de contenus pédagogiques indexés par une ontologie. Thèse de Doctorat. Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse. Université de Toulouse.
  21. Schumpeter, J. (1912). Théorie de l’évolution économique. Paris : Payot (réédition 1935).

Displays: 9461; Downloads: 836;