Nikitina N., Romanova E., Grebennikova V. Qulimetry and educology in continuous peofessional training for socionomic specialists: multidisciplinary approach. LIFELONG EDUCATION: The 21st Century.
2016. № 4 (16). DOI: 10.15393/j5.art.2016.3264

Lifelong learning in the modern world: the research and design methodology

pdf-version

Qulimetry and educology in continuous peofessional training for socionomic specialists: multidisciplinary approach

Nikitina Natalya
D.Sc., Full Professor
the Outstanding Educator Award RF, Professor at Chair of Social Pedagogic, Leading researcher of Scientific-educational Center of the Research Institute of Perspective Tends and Technologies of the Russian State Social University
(Moscow, Russia)
nn0803@mail.ru

Romanova Elena
D.Sc., Full Professor
Docent at the Chair of Mathematics and Informatics, Senior researcher of Scientific-educational Center of the Research Institute of Perspective Tends and Technologies of the Russian State Social University
(Moscow, Russia)
klenar2001@mail.ru

Grebennikova Veronika
D.Sc., Full Professor
the Head of the Chair of Pedagogic and Psychology, the Dean of the Faculty of Pedagogic, Psychology and Communicative Science of the Kubansky State University
(Krasnodar, Russia)
vmgrebennikova@mail.ru

Keywords:
qualimetry
educology
professional education
multidisciplinary approach
socionomic specialists

Abstract: At the present stage of continuous professional training development for specialists of socionomic ("helping") professions (such as social pedagogues, social workers, psychologists, experts in social work, doctors and lawyers for social services, tutors, social pedagogues, etc.,) new ways for improving the educational institutions performance engaged in recurrent training are being actively looked for. One of these ways is the development and realization of the content-related and technological basis of the qualitative management processes in professional training of the socionomic profile specialists on the foundation of conceptual educology positions. The purpose of the article is to consider the variative (multidisciplinary) approach to the feasibility of the theoretical and methodological foundations of qualimetry and educology for continuous professional training of socionomic specialists within the system "College – University – Postgraduate Education". The authors present the original interpretation of the concept of qualitative control of continuous management in professional training. Special attention is focused on the eductologic aspects of the design and implementation of the quality management system for recurrent professional training of socionomic specialists. The substantial characteristics of various approaches to the definition of professional education quality, such as subject-oriented, result-oriented, value-oriented, administrative-oriented, market-oriented, benchmarking, and others are presented in the article. The qualimetric and mathematical models of quality assessment in the system of postgraduate education are considered. The results of investigation might be applied in professional training for socionomic specialists.

Paper submitted on: 11/10/2016; Accepted on: 11/16/2016; Published online on: 12/20/2016.

1. Bauman Z. Individualizirovannoe obschestvo. Per. s angl. pod red. V. L. Inozemtseva. M.: «Logos», 2005.

2. Kachestvo vyisshego obrazovaniya: kollektiv. monograf. / Pod red. M. P. Karpenko. M.: Izd-vo SGU, 2012.

3. Golubev V. V. Vyisshee obrazovanie i nekotoryie problemyi sovremennoy tsivilizatsii // Naukovedenie. Internet-zhurnal. URL: http://naukovedenie.ru/?id=144

4. Issledovaniya SGA v oblasti edukologii (pod ruk. M. P. Karpenko). http://www.muh.ru/struct/dko.php

5. Mitskevich N. Edukologiya: invariantnyie harakteristiki. URL: http://adukatar.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/Adukatar_17_Page_21-26.pdf

6. Voronin A. S. Slovar terminov po obschey i sotsialnoy pedagogike. URL: http://window.edu.ru/catalog/pdf2txt/673/28673/11886?p_page=13

7. Prokoptsev V. I. Edukologiya: printsipialno novaya nauka obrazovaniya. URL: http://refdb.ru/look/2281628-pall.html

8. Bordovskiy G., Izvozchikov V. Edukologiya kak nauka ob obrazovanii. URL: http://refdb.ru/look/1685731.html

9. Bordovskiy G. L., Nesterov A. A., Tryapitsyin S. Yu. Upravlenie kachestvom obrazovatelnogo protsessa. SPb.: Izd-vo RGPU im. A.I. Gertsena, 2001.

10. Kuzmina N. V. Akmeologicheskaya teoriya kachestva podgotovki spetsialistov obrazovaniya: monografiya. M.: Issledovatelskiy tsentr problem kachestva podgotovki spetsialistov, 2001.

11. Otsenka kachestva professionalnogo obrazovaniya. Doklad (5 maya 2001) / Pod obschey redaktsiey V. I. Baydenko, Dzh. van Zantvorta. M.: Issledovatelskiy tsentr problem kachestva podgotovki spetsialistov, 2001.

12. Selezneva N. A. Kachestvo vyisshego obrazovaniya kak ob'ekt sistemnogo issledovaniya. Lektsiya-doklad. Izd. 3-e. M.: Issledovatelskiy tsentr problem kachestva podgotovki spetsialistov, 2003.

13. Subetto A. I. Kachestvo nepreryivnogo obrazovaniya: logika razvitiya i problemyi. SPb. – Voronezh: Asterion, 2005.

14. Subetto A. I., Selezneva N. A. Kachestvo obrazovaniya kak sintezator problem razvitiya obrazovaniya v Rossii // Kachestvo obrazovaniya: kontseptsii, problemyi. Novosibirsk. Izd-vo NGTU, 2000.

15. Vlasceanu L., Grunberg L., Parlea D. Quality Assurance and Accreditation: A Glossary of Basic Terms and Definitions. Bucharest, 2007.

16. Frazer M. Assuring Quality in Higher Education: A Blueprint for Future. Higher Education Supplement Quality Debate Conference, 1993.

17. Aaviksoo Ya. Obespechenie kachestva: neortodoksalnyiy vzglyad na problemu // Alma Mater (Vestnik vyisshey shkolyi). 2002. # 6. S.5.

18. Ermakov A. Kachestvo obrazovaniya: mozhno li ego garantirovat ili hotya byi proverit // Pravoslavie. 2008. # 3. S. 2.

19. Motova G. N., Navodnov V. G. Ekspertiza kachestva obrazovaniya: evropeyskiy podhod. M.: Natsionalnoe akkreditatsionnoe agentstvo v sfere obrazovaniya, 2008.

20. Apakaev P. A., Merlina N. I., Matveeva O. A. Sistemno-funktsionalnyiy analiz podhodov k ponyatiyu «kachestvo obrazovaniya» // Sovremennyie problemyi nauki i obrazovaniya. 2012. # 3. URL: www.science-education.ru/103-6444 (data obrascheniya: 15.08.2016).

21. Frayssin Zh. Matetika: transdistsiplinarnaya kontseptsiya obucheniya v tsifrovyih setyah // Nepreryivnoe obrazovanie: XXI vek. Vyipusk 1 (13), 2016, DOI: 10.15393/j5.art.2016.3074

22. Zhukova G. S., Komarova E. V., Nikitina N. I. Kvalimetricheskiy podhod v sisteme dopolnitelnogo professionalnogo obrazovaniya spetsialistov sotsialnoy sferyi: monogr. M.: Izd-vo RGSU, 2012.

23. Nikitina N. I., Romanova E. Yu., Komarova E. V., Tolstikova S. N., Grebennikova V. M. Qualimetric methods in the evaluation of the quality of professional training of specialists in social work // Review of European Studies. 2015. T. 7. # 3. S. 66-79.

24. Grebennikova V. M., Nikitina N. I., Komarova E. V. K voprosu ob otsenke kachestva dopolnitelnogo profobrazovaniya spetsialistov sotsialnogo profilya na osnove kvalimetricheskogo podhoda // Fundamentalnyie issledovaniya. 2014. # 11-3. S. 605-611.

25. Bryizgalina E. V. Problemyi otsenki kachestva obrazovaniya: teoriya i praktika// Estestvenno-nauchnoe obrazovanie: vzaimodeystvie sredney i vyisshey shkolyi. Sbornik / Pod obschey red. akademika RAN, prof. V. V. Lunina i prof. N. E. Kuzmenko, M., 2012. S. 122.

26. Tatur Yu. G. Kompetentnost v strukture modeli kachestva podgotovki spetsialista // Vyisshee obrazovanie segodnya. 2004. # 3. S.13-18.

27. Shihov Yu. A. Proektirovanie i realizatsiya kompleksnogo kvalimetricheskogo monitoringa podgotovki uchaschihsya v sisteme «profilnaya shkola – vtuz» : avtoref. dis. ... dokt. ped. nauk. Izhevsk, 2008.

28. Subetto A. I. Ontologiya i epistemologiya kompetentnostnogo podhoda, klassifikatsiya i kvalimetriya kompetentsiy. M.: Issledovatelskiy tsentr problem kachestva podgotovki spetsialistov, 2006.

29. Lobashev V. D., Lobashev I. V. Pedagogicheskaya kvalimetriya rezultatov obucheniya // Standartyi i monitoring v obrazovanii. 2005. #1. S. 21-27.

30. Chernova Yu. K., Schipanov V. V., Yaryigina I. S. Kvalitativnoe proektirovanie obrazovaniya i obrazovatelnyih uslug. M.: Issledovat. tsentr problem kachestva podgotovki spetsialistov, 2002.

31. Subetto A. I. Kvalimetriya cheloveka i obrazovaniya: genezis, stanovlenie, razvitie, problemyi i perspektivyi. M.: Issledovatelskiy tsentr problem kachestva podgotovki spetsialistov, 2006.

32. Straka, G. Measurement and evaluation of competence, in: P. Descy, P. & M. Tessaring (Eds.) The foundations of evaluation and impact research. Third report on vocational training research in Europe: background report (Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities)

33. Birnbaum A. Some Latent Trait Models and Their Use in Inferring and Examinee’s Ability. In Lord F.M., Novick M. Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Addison-Wesley Publ. Co. Reading, Mass, 1968. - P.397-479.

34. Rasch G. Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. Copenhagen, 1960, Danish Institute of Educational Research. (Expanded edition, Chicago, 1980, The University of Chicago Press).

35. Romanova E. Yu., Nikitina N. I., Komarova E. V. Matematicheskie metodyi v otsenke kachestva nepreryivnogo profobrazovaniya spetsialistov sotsionomicheskogo profilya // Distantsionnoe i virtualnoe obuchenie. 2015. # 7 (97). S. 73-83.

36. Natsionalnaya doktrina obrazovaniya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii do 2025 URL: https://rg.ru/2000/10/11/doktrina-dok.html (data obrascheniya: 29.10.2016).

Displays: 8626; Downloads: 895;

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15393/j5.art.2016.3264