MASHKOVA E., SHALINA M. DEVELOPMENT OF SLOW READING SKILLS FOR PHILOLOGY STUDENTS : OVERCOMING THE CHALLENGES OF CLIP THINKING. LIFELONG EDUCATION: The 21st Century.
2026. Vol. 14. No. 1. DOI: 10.15393/j5.art.2026.11709


Vol. 14. No. 1.

Innovative approaches to lifelong learning

pdf-version

DEVELOPMENT OF SLOW READING SKILLS FOR PHILOLOGY STUDENTS : OVERCOMING THE CHALLENGES OF CLIP THINKING

MASHKOVA Ekaterina Ye.
PhD in Philology, Associate Professor of the Department of Russian and Ukrainian Philology
Fevzi Yakubov Crimean Engineering and Pedagogical University
(Simferopol, Republic of Crimea)
lebed_ekaterina@bk.ru
SHALINA Marina A.
PhD in Philology, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Philological Disciplines and Methods of Teaching
V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University
(Yevpatoria, Republic of Crimea)
marie_ka@mail.ru
Keywords:
slow reading
clip thinking
philological education
literary text analysis
close reading
text interpretation
I. Turgenev
«The Torrents of Spring».
Abstract: the article addresses the problem of overcoming clip thinking among philology students in the context of digital transformation. As a solution, the targeted implementation of the close/slow reading method is proposed; its theoretical foundations and practical applications in domestic and international traditions are analyzed. The text examines in detail the levels of working with a text (linguistic, semantic, structural, cultural) and algorithms for organizing the educational process, including principles for text selection, commentary, and group interpretation. A university course in the History of Russian literature is considered an optimal platform for testing this method. Using the analysis of I. Turgenev’s novella «The Torrents of Spring» as an example, the article demonstrates how slow reading uncovers deeper meanings through attention to details of portraits, gestures, and symbols. It is proven that the systematic application of this methodology develops skills for holistic text perception, enhances analytical abilities, and compensates for the effects of a fragmented consciousness. The proposed approach contributes not only to the professional development of philologists but also to personal reflection, preventing superficial interaction with the text.
Paper submitted on: 10/08/2025; Accepted on: 01/31/2026; Published online on: 03/26/2026.

References

  1. Girenok F. I. The pleasure of thinking differently. Moscow, 2008. 235 p. (In Russ.)
  2. Petrunina N. V. Experience in interpreting poetic texts using the method of careful (slow) reading. Yazyk i kul’tura: Dvadcat’ shestaya mezhdunarodnaya nauchnaya konferenciya [Language and Culture: Proceedings of the XXVI International Scientific Conference, Oct. 27–30, 2015]. Tomsk, 2016. P. 58–60. (In Russ.)
  3. Semenovskikh T. V. The phenomenon of «clip thinking» in the university educational environment [Electronic resource]. Naukovedenie [Science Studies]. 2014. No. 5 (24). Electron. dan. URL: http://naukovedenie.ru/PDF/105PVN514.pdf (date of acсess 09.09.2025). (In Russ.)
  4. Frumkin K. G. Global changes in thinking and the fate of textual culture. Ineternum. 2010. No.  1. P. 26–36. (In Russ.)
  5. Churlyaeva T. N. Teaching reading in the process of training of philologists: on the problem of understanding and interpreting literary texts. Sibirskij pedagogicheskij zhurnal [Siberian Pedagogical Journal]. 2015. No.  5. P. 61–64. (In Russ.)
  6. Zorina N. V. The method of attentive (slow) reading: theory and experience of using. Yazyk i kul’tura [Language and culture]. 2021. No.  55. P. 220–233. DOI: 10.1722319996195/55/14 (In Russ.)
  7. Mitrofanova I. I. Clip-Based thinking: reality and prospects. Rechevye tekhnologii [Speech technologies]. 2019. No.  1. P. 67–81. (In Russ.)
  8. Lappo M. A. Technology of «slow reading» (psycholinguistic analysis of M. Tsvetaeva’s poem «So they listen...». Psikholingvisticheskie aspekty izucheniya rechevoj deyatel’nosti [Psycholinguistic aspects of studying speech activity]. 2012. No.  10. P. 49–70. (In Russ.)
  9. Ehjdel’man N. Ya. Learn to read! Znaniye – sila [Knowledge is power]. 1979. No.  8. P. 1–8. (In Russ.)
  10. Lihachev D. S. Literature – reality – literature. Leningrad, 1981. 216 p. (In Russ.)
  11. Hrustaleva A. V. Slow reading by M. O. Gershenzon: at the origins of the method. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Ser.: Gumanitarnye nauki [Tambov University Review. Series: Humanities]. 2009. No.  6 (74). P. 288–298. (In Russ.)
  12. Gershenzon M. The Wisdom of Pushkin. Moscow, 1919. 232 p. (In Russ.)
  13. Vinogradova E. M. «Unit to unit and form to form»: a method of slow reading of literary text (Part I). Russkij yazyk v shkole [Russian language at school]. 2018. No. 4. P. 27–31. DOI: 10.30515/0131-6141-2018-79-4-27-31 (In Russ.)
  14. Kamenskaya I. B., Kartavaya Yu. K., Mashkova Ye. Ye. [et al.]. Student scientific club as a school of scientific thinking for a philologist: from educational experience. Simferopol, 2024. 263 p. (In Russ.)
  15. Yesaulov I. A. The spectrum of adequacy in the interpretation of a literary work. Nikolai Gogol’s «Mirgorod». Moscow, 1997. 101 p. (In Russ.)
  16. Lipke Sh. I. S. Turgenev’s novella «The Torrents of Spring» as a tragedy in prose: internal compulsion to mimetic rivalry as Sanin’s hamartia. Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Ser.: Literaturovedenie, zhurnalistika [Bulletin of Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series Studies in literature, journalism]. 2024. No. 3. P. 431–439. DOI: 10.22363/2312-9220-2024-29-3-431-439 (In Russ.)
  17. Volkov I. O. «The Italian Text» in I. Turgenev’s novella «The Torrents of Spring» (1871). Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Tomsk State University Journal]. 2017. No. 48. P. 5–13. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/418/1 (In Russ.)

Displays: 30; Downloads: 4;

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15393/j5.art.2026.11709